Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
European Respiratory Journal Conference: European Respiratory Society International Congress, ERS ; 60(Supplement 66), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2270903

ABSTRACT

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine severity in patients who have had SARS-CoV2 pneumonia. Method(s): A cohort of 802 patients from our post-COVID multidisciplinary unit treated at least 30 days after being discharged from hospital was analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (admission to the Intensive Care Unit or Intermediate Respiratory Care Unit), group 2 (admission to conventional hospitalization), and group 3 (outpatient management without hospitalization). Symptoms, quality of life, daily physical activity, emotional state, biomarkers of systemic inflammation and KL-6 levels were evaluated. Result(s): A total of 802 patients with a median (interquartile range) age 59 (48-70 years) at diagnosis were reviewed, of whom 439 (54.8%) were women. Dyspnea was reported by 351 (66.%) patients and 142 (36.4%) had a grade more than 2 on the mMRC scale. Likewise, 106 (20.1%) presented dry cough and 233 (44.5%) asthenia. There were significant differences between groups 2 and 3 in: dyspnea (p=0.04), myalgia (p=0.04) and asthenia (p=0.01). Group 1 had a higher score in the TTO and VAS rates of the EuroQuoL scale compared to group 2. Finally, the KL6 levels in groups 1, 2 and 3 were: 381.50 (304 - 511.75) U/ml, 372 (249 - 483) U/ml and 298 (231.5 - 398) U/ml, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between the 3 groups (p=0.001) and in the post-hoc analysis, lower levels of KL-6 were observed in group 3 compared to the other two groups. Conclusion(s): There is evidence to affirm that KL6 levels in post-COVID patients are related to the severity of the acute episode.

2.
Revista Clinica Espanola ; 223(3):154-164, 2023.
Article in English, Spanish | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2255251

ABSTRACT

Background and objective: Biologic therapies are known to reduce exacerbations and improve severe uncontrolled asthma management. The at-home administration of biologics has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the characteristics of severe uncontrolled asthma patients who may benefit from at-home administration of biologic therapy have yet to be identified. Material(s) and Method(s): This project is based on the Delphi method, designed to reach an expert consensus through a multidisciplinary scientific committee addressing the following questions: clinical characteristics, treatment adherence, patient or caregiver administration ability, patient self-care, relationship with the healthcare professional, patient preference, and access to the hospital. Result(s): One hundred and thirty-one healthcare professionals (pulmonologists, allergists, nurses, and hospital pharmacists) completed two Delphi consensus questionnaires. Fourteen items were identified as priority characteristics, the first five being: 1. The patient follows the healthcare team's indications/recommendations to control their disease, 2. The patient is capable of detecting any deterioration in their disease and of identifying exacerbation triggers, 3. The patient receives biologic therapy and has stable disease with no vital risk, 4. The patient takes responsibility for their self-care, 5. The patient has occupational/educational obligations that prevent them from going to the hospital regularly. Conclusion(s): Disease stability and control plus the ability to identify exacerbation triggers are the most important characteristics when opting for at-home administration for a patient with severe uncontrolled asthma on biologic therapy. These recommendations could be applicable in clinical practice.Copyright © 2022

3.
Revista Clínica Española ; 2023.
Article in Spanish | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-2239840

ABSTRACT

Resumen Antecedentes y objetivo Es bien sabido que las terapias biológicas reducen las exacerbaciones y mejoran el tratamiento del asma grave no controlada. La administración domiciliaria de biológicos ha aumentado durante la pandemia de COVID-19, pero aún no se han identificado las características de los pacientes con asma grave no controlada que pueden beneficiarse de la administración domiciliaria de terapia biológica. Materiales y métodos Este proyecto se basa en la metodología Delphi, diseñada para alcanzar un consenso entre expertos a través de un comité científico multidisciplinar que aborda las siguientes cuestiones: características clínicas, adherencia al tratamiento, capacidad de administración del paciente o cuidador, autocuidado del paciente, relación con el profesional sanitario, preferencias del paciente y acceso al hospital. Resultados Ciento treinta y un profesionales sanitarios (neumólogos, alergólogos, enfermeros y farmacéuticos hospitalarios) cumplimentaron las dos rondas de consenso del cuestionario Delphi. Se identificaron 14 ítems como características prioritarias, siendo los cinco primeros: 1. El paciente sigue las indicaciones/recomendaciones del equipo sanitario para controlar su enfermedad. 2. El paciente es capaz de detectar cualquier deterioro de su enfermedad y de identificar los factores desencadenantes de las exacerbaciones. 3. El paciente recibe tratamiento biológico y tiene una enfermedad estable sin riesgo vital. 4. El paciente se responsabiliza de su autocuidado y 5. el paciente tiene obligaciones laborales/educativas que le impiden acudir al hospital con regularidad. Conclusiones La estabilidad y el control de la enfermedad junto a la capacidad de identificar los factores desencadenantes de las exacerbaciones son las características más importantes a la hora de optar por la administración domiciliaria en un paciente con asma grave no controlada en tratamiento biológico. Estas recomendaciones podrían ser aplicables a la práctica clínica. Background and objective Biologic therapies are known to reduce exacerbations and improve severe uncontrolled asthma management. The at-home administration of biologics has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the characteristics of severe uncontrolled asthma patients who may benefit from at-home administration of biologic therapy have yet to be identified. Materials and methods This project is based on the Delphi method, designed to reach an expert consensus through a multidisciplinary scientific committee addressing the following questions: clinical characteristics, treatment adherence, patient or caregiver administration ability, patient self-care, relationship with the healthcare professional, patient preference, and access to the hospital. Results One hundred and thirty-one healthcare professionals (pulmonologists, allergists, nurses, and hospital pharmacists) completed two Delphi consensus questionnaires. Fourteen items were identified as priority characteristics, the first five being: 1. The patient follows the healthcare team's indications/recommendations to control their disease, 2. The patient is capable of detecting any deterioration in their disease and of identifying exacerbation triggers, 3. The patient receives biologic therapy and has stable disease with no vital risk, 4. The patient takes responsibility for their self-care, 5. The patient has occupational/educational obligations that prevent them from going to the hospital regularly. Conclusions Disease stability and control plus the ability to identify exacerbation triggers are the most important characteristics when opting for at-home administration for a patient with severe uncontrolled asthma on biologic therapy. These recommendations could be applicable in clinical practice.

4.
Rev Clin Esp (Barc) ; 223(3): 154-164, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2159749

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Biologic therapies are known to reduce exacerbations and improve severe uncontrolled asthma management. The at-home administration of biologics has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the characteristics of severe uncontrolled asthma patients who may benefit from at-home administration of biologic therapy have yet to be identified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This project is based on the Delphi method, designed to reach an expert consensus through a multidisciplinary scientific committee addressing the following questions: clinical characteristics, treatment adherence, patient or caregiver administration ability, patient self-care, relationship with the healthcare professional, patient preference, and access to the hospital. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-one healthcare professionals (pulmonologists, allergists, nurses, and hospital pharmacists) completed two Delphi consensus questionnaires. Fourteen items were identified as priority characteristics, the first five being: 1. The patient follows the healthcare team's indications/recommendations to control their disease, 2. The patient is capable of detecting any deterioration in their disease and of identifying exacerbation triggers, 3. The patient receives biologic therapy and has stable disease with no vital risk, 4. The patient takes responsibility for their self-care, 5. The patient has occupational/educational obligations that prevent them from going to the hospital regularly. CONCLUSION: Disease stability and control plus the ability to identify exacerbation triggers are the most important characteristics when opting for at-home administration for a patient with severe uncontrolled asthma on biologic therapy. These recommendations could be applicable in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Biological Products , COVID-19 , Humans , Consensus , Pandemics , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL